Customize your website

Solar installers fume over rate reduction

Peter Glover of Ottawa Solar Power says provincial rate reductions are driving away customers. (Photo by Etienne Ranger)

Peter Glover of Ottawa Solar Power says provincial rate reductions are driving away customers. (Photo by Etienne Ranger)

Published on July 28th, 2010
Published on July 28th, 2010
OBJ Contributor
Ottawa Business Journal

Ottawa solar power installers say they're losing business in a big way, after provincial regulators recently reduced rates paid to backyard sun-fueled power producers.

Topics :
Solar Power , Ontario Power Authority , Ottawa Power Authority , Ottawa , Ontario

 

"We're looking at dropping about $1.5 million below revenue expectations this year," said Peter Glover, director of sales and marketing for Ottawa Solar Power.

A big part of the attraction for residential solar projects has been the high price the province has typically paid for surplus power.

But the Ontario Power Authority dropped the rate from 80.2 cents per kilowatt hour to 58.8 cents in early July, and some say the business implications were felt immediately.

"We've lost 16 clients within the last week," said Mr. Glover.

Ontario's microFIT program, began last October, sets the prices for surplus power from small solar energy projects – those producing 10 kilowatts or less – much higher than the going rate of below 10 cents per kilowatt hour.

But the drop from 80.2 to 58.8 cents is still enough to sour the deal for many customers.

Ottawa Solar Power had 42 ground-mounted contracts awaiting approval, Mr. Glover said. But when the rate dropped all these deals fell through, after customers complained the new six-per-cent rate of return wasn't high enough to cover the installation cost, he added.

The saving grace for Ottawa Solar Power was that the changes only affect ground-mounted systems.

"Many of our clients have opted to move [the solar panel] to their roof," said Mr. Glover.

According to an Ottawa Power Authority press release, the new rate reflects lower costs associated with installing a ground-mounted solar photovoltaic project compared to a rooftop one.

For Ottawa Solar Power this means refocusing their business toward roof mounted systems, said Mr. Glover.

But other solar panel installation companies have adopted a different strategy.

"Lots of companies went out in good faith and invested in infrastructure for sales under the assumption that the market would be boosted by subsidies," said Jim Cummings, president of Ottawa solar panel installer Clearly Solar.

He added Clearly Solar isn't trying to move its customers to roof-mounted systems – instead, Mr. Cummings says he's choosing to fight.

"Right now we're taking the position that if all of us get together and voice our outrage it's possible they may back down on this," said Mr. Cummings, adding that the government didn't give the industry fair warning.

Clearly Solar has between 50 and 75 ground-mounted contracts pending, each worth around $80,000, said Mr. Cummings. "That's about $4 million in jeopardy."

Most of their microFIT customers are rural farmers who might not have a roof facing the right way, he said.

Mr. Cummings added the province originally said it would evaluate all applications for the microFIT program within 30 days, but that the time frame for evaluations kept getting pushed back.

"Some companies haven’t had a job in six months," he said. "It's the worst case of political and bureaucratic bungling I've ever seen."

Rural farmers are leading the backlash because they were early adopters of the program, said Warren Abor, president of Ottawa solar installation company ISolara.

"I don't know if the government will be able to make this stand because I've never seen so many angry people before," he said.

Indeed, the rate change seems to have shifted the solar marketplace from land-rich rural areas to more rooftop-inclined urban markets, said Mr. Abor.

"It woke up the market for people in the city," he said, adding many urbanites now realize they can earn a high rate of return with rooftop panels, said Mr. Abor.

During an Ontario Power Authority conference call on July 6 and 8, five neighbours explained they had pooled their money to get a deal on five installations. But because of the timing of their applications, only three got the conditional offer at 80.2 cents, while the other two landed at 58.8 cents, according to Mr. Glover.

The OPA is holding a 30-day consultation period on the proposed new price.

"The change has hurt public perception of the program," said Joshua Pearce, a renewable energy engineering professor at Queens University, in an e-mail.

Mr. Pearce said there is reluctance on the part of solar businesses to set up full-scale manufacturing operations because they are unsure about long-term support from the Ontario government.

"Literally thousands of people who supported the program (are) now likely to pull out disappointed, and feeling cheated."

-By Mathew Klie-Cribb

 

Comments

  • Username
    Lois Thomson
    - July 29th, 2010 at 11:10:47

    My husband was the one who called in to say three of our buying group made it in and two of us were left out in the cold. We aren't hooked up to the grid yet and one couple has been feeding into the grid since May 13th with no compensation or correspondence at all from the OPA. Manufacturers and installers have been hurt by order cancellations, but we had no choice but to "agree" to the proposed low price because we can't sell our power to anyone else. The part that hurts is that the OPA says "lots" of people are accepting the new rate. They use those "figures" to "prove" the rate is acceptable, but "lots" of people accepting only proves to me that lots of people are in the same bind we are. We weren't the only ones who trusted what we read on a government web site and installed systems assuming the offer would come eventually. The OPA site said: Guaranteed rate for 20 years. Next price review in 2011. Allow 30 days for offer. No offer will be refused where grid capacity allows. If we were fools to trust this McGuinty government, then who is smart to trust them? I can't imagine what would happen If lots of people invested in Canada by buying Canada Savings Bonds at X% return, only to find out when they returned to the bank to pick up the bonds the rate had been cut. I hope the OPA comes back after the 30 days and tries to save face by "listening" to Ontario and honouring any application that was submitted prior to their July 2nd rate change announcement, but at the very least for people and companies who can prove they have spent money in any way to accommodate installation(s) of ground-mount solar PV systems.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    J.P. De Grandmont
    - July 29th, 2010 at 09:01:20

    McGuinty and his government seem to support and encourage the myth that rising taxes adn electrical costs are directly linked to the cost of stimulating Ontario's solar energy industry. There is of course no such link. McGuinty and his government prefer to offer foreigners like Samsung and Korea Powers subsidies of $437,000,000 as well as guaranteed power production rates. McGuinty's confidence in Ontario residents capability of developing our own homegrown solar energy industry is shameful. McGuinty and his government have effectively killed or at the very least severely crippled a burgeoning green energy industry by this underhanded approach

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Bill Graham
    - July 29th, 2010 at 09:01:10

    I am one of those five rural neighbours mentioned in the article. My application was posted at OPA on March 2. It took over four months before the OPA stopped stalling me and told me about the price reduction. I suspect that they knew their course of action as early as March 1. On May 13 I was connected to the grid like my neighbours and have generated 1700 kilowatt hours without the necessary conditional offer. The rationale for the reduction is flawed and it is rural people who will suffer. It is a cynical move by the McGuinty government since there will little political fallout since most rural ridings vote Conservative. I was naive to trust the government.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Rob Dan
    - July 28th, 2010 at 17:23:19

    Assuming that everyone has thirty percent of the installation cost available up front is a stretch. Aside from the first assumption, I would like the analyst of the cost- benefit analysis for the ground tracker to let me know where I can purchase a tracker for $90,000 that guarantees an average annual production level of 16,600 kwh per year for twenty years, because I'll purchase 1,000 of them. There was also no additional maintenance or repair costs worked into the analysis and if you include the initial equity infusion then the return (in addition to the original incorrect assumptions & numbers) will be less than the stated 11%.

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Email to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

Ottawa Business Journal is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Enter the following code

Please copy the text above in this box.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Expert bloggers

Deloitte
Blogger
Shiraj Keshvani - Shiraj Keshvani
Using Tax Compliance to Build a...
[Sponsored]
Richardson GMP Limited
Blogger
Alan MacDonald - Alan MacDonald
What Dirty Harry Can Teach Us About...
[Sponsored]
André Filion & Associates...
Blogger
Craig Dowden - Craig Dowden
Do What You Love and the Money Will...
[Sponsored]
More bloggers here

Advertising