• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (3)
  •  

And in this corner: The MPAC challenger

Published on February 10, 2010
Published on February 10, 2010
Michael Prentice  RSS Feed

Now’s the time to grapple with MPAC, if you can

The time of year is fast approaching when lots of people go ballistic about their property tax bill. Soon we’ll be hearing in the mail just how much more we owe to keep the city running another year.

Topics :
Municipal Property Assessment , Ottawa , Ontario , Westboro

But it could well be worth challenging your property assessment. As I’ve argued in a previous column, you may be surprised how good your chances are of winning.

Many homeowners face increases in 2010 property taxes well above the hike the City of Ottawa is aiming for in its spending. That’s due to inflationary increases in home values, on which property taxes are based.

People love to complain that they are overtaxed, and they especially seem to love to complain that they pay an unfair burden of the property tax bill.

As I wrote back in September of last year, significant numbers of Ottawa homeowners have successfully claimed that the assessed value of their homes was too high in 2009. As a result, they’ll pay less tax this year and in future years.

Latest figures show that about 50 per cent of Ottawa homeowners who contested their 2009 assessments were successful in lowering property taxes.

In many cases, the reduction in a home’s assessed value was about 10 per cent. On a typical property tax bill of $3,000 a year, that’s a tax saving of $300 a year. For high-end homeowners, a successful challenge of their assessment can save of thousands of dollars per year.

The average reduction of 10 per cent was on more than 2,300 Ottawa homes whose owners challenged their assessment last year and then accepted a reduced assessment offered by the Municipal Property Assessment Corp.

MPAC, as it is known, is the independent agency that sets values for all properties in the province, both residential and commercial.

The provincial agency voluntarily lowered assessments on these 2,300 Ottawa homes after the owners showed that similar homes in the same neighbourhood had been selling for less.

In addition, MPAC agreed to lower assessments on about 1,200 homes, and is awaiting word from these homeowners on whether they will accept the reduction.

Even if some of these 1,200 owners reject the revised assessment, MPAC will notify the city of the lowered assessment anyway. Their property tax will be lowered. But in such cases the homeowner still has the right to appeal, to seek a greater reduction.

At last count, 86 Ottawa property owners had rejected a lowered assessment offered by MPAC in 2009.

Altogether, however, that’s about 3,600 property owners who will pay a lower tax bill this year after they requested a review by MPAC. That’s about half of slightly more than 7,000 who sought a review in 2009. In the other half of cases, MPAC upheld its original assessment, after reviewing the facts.

Now is the time of year to think about seeking a review of your property taxes. The deadline for seeking a review this year is March 31.

Marcel Clement, a senior spokesman for MPAC in Ottawa, stressed back in September that the agency wants to know if its assessments are too high. He says the same thing today. “If an assessment is too high, we’ll lower it,” he says emphatically.

That makes sense. MPAC exists solely to accurately assess property values. It gains nothing – and loses credibility – if it fails to recognize mistakes.

Currently, we are in the midst of a four-year period in which all property assessments in Ontario are based on a property’s value in January 2008.

Where a property’s value increased by more than average in the three-year period prior to January 2008, the increased assessment is being phased in over four years, and will not be fully implemented until 2012.

This system was devised by the Ontario government to protect property owners from a large, sudden increase in assessment. But it means some property owners – particularly owners of expensive homes in trendy neighbourhoods, such as the Glebe and Westboro – are currently paying less than their fair share.

Is the current property tax system fair? Arguably, the property tax is the fairest tax we have. Consider this:

- High-income individuals have more ways to avoid paying income tax than the average wage earner. That’s unfair to low-income people.

– High-income people travel abroad more than low-income people, meaning they escape paying any Canadian sales tax while buying and spending abroad. That means others pay an unfair share of sales tax.

– The property tax is the only unavoidable tax we have. There’s no escaping property tax, if you own property. And what’s wrong with taxing someone twice as much if they live in a $500,000 home, rather than a home worth $250,000? (By the way, I see no reason why seniors should receive a break on their property taxes, which some people are demanding, just because they’re seniors.)

In order to make a successful challenge of your assessment, you must be able to show that your home was worth less in January 2008 than its 2008 assessment. That means knowing how much homes like yours in your neighbourhood were selling for two years ago. Current home values in Ottawa are typically about 10 per cent higher today than they were in January 2008.

For information on how to seek a review of your assessment, go to mpac.ca

Comments

  • Username
    Billy Smyth
    - December 19, 2012 at 16:04:45

    I would agree with the other reader, it isn't just high income earners that can find ways to avoid taxes. Anyone can take advantage these tax breaks, it is just people at higher incomes (a marginal tax rate of 35% versus 18% for example) so saving 1% here amounts to a lot more. Property taxes are also a municipal tax, whereas income is provincial and federal. The money goes to a very different place. The people in the suburbs are actually the ones being subsidized if you were to count use of services per capita. Land value taxation for property taxes would solve the inequity in the system. There are many stories of people that bought a house who live very modest lives in a "bad" downtown neighbourhood, only to be forced to move in retirement because the area has become trendy.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Frank-Ly
    - February 12, 2010 at 07:53:49

    I take exception to 2 comments: I kind of like the way higher income folks can find ways to avoid tax, it is hardly unfair to low income earners.. Staying in school and taking a higher earning path should be rewarded. My view is that senoirs should get a break on property tax. In fact, once you have paid school tax portions for 23 years, we all should be exempt. Maybe that would force down some associated school costs.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Stephanie Burnett
      - December 13, 2010 at 13:21:14

      I would like to know the cost of running the MPAC organization: staff + offices. Would it not make more sense to dissolve this agency, reducing the costs of fighting "unfair" assessments and just simply put a Municipal tax on our annual tax returns? That way all tax payers will contribute to their Municipal government.

      This comment is offensive

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Expert bloggers

Equitas Consultants Inc.
Blogger
Ron Prehogan
Family Business Longevity: The...
Design 1st
Blogger
Kevin J. Bailey
The Backyard Inventor's Maze:
Impact Public Affairs
Blogger
Huw Williams
How to be a PR Star!

More bloggers here

CASE STUDY VIDEOS

Building stronger communities across Ottawa
Domicile Developments

An investment in yourself
LC Fitness Studio

No surprises, no upselling
RE/MAX Citywide Realty

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising