Feds to test private-sector tech within departments



Stay Technologies president Yves St-Arnaud. (photo by Victor Turco)

Stay Technologies president Yves St-Arnaud. (photo by Victor Turco)

Peter Kovessy
Published on October 19, 2010
Published on October 19, 2010
Peter Kovessy  RSS Feed
Ottawa Business Journal

Industry group calls $40M program 'right on'

About a year ago, Yves St-Arnaud began working on new software to make governments and businesses more efficient in delivering information management and IT services.

Topics :
Public Works and Government Services Canada , Canadian Advanced Technology Alliance , Stay Technologies , Canada

 

The president of Gatineau-based Stay Technologies, which specializes in IM/IT professional services and IT service management training, developed a program called Management of Services Tool, or MST. It allows information management and technology organizations to document services provided, compile end-user requests, cost and associated resources required, and ultimately build and manage agreements to properly justify IM/IT costs.

Even though MST was built to work with government systems, Stay Technologies quickly encountered hurdles relatively common to vendors pitching innovative products to Public Works.

Indeed, how can a firm sell leading-edge products to the government when Public Works doesn’t even have a category for it – let alone a solicitation upon which that technology is required?

“Government procurement is not in line with innovation,” said Mr. St-Arnaud.

It’s a message federal politicians and bureaucrats have heard repeatedly, and a problem senior procurement officials hope to address with a recently unveiled program allowing companies to test cutting-edge technology within the government.

“Traditionally, (the government) identifies a need and puts out a call (for tenders). But when there are new products or innovation on the market, we don’t know we need them,” said Shereen Miller, a director-general in Public Works’s acquisition branch, during a recent conference call hosted by the Canadian Advanced Technology Alliance.

Late last month, Public Works launched the Canadian Innovation Commercialization Program as a pilot project to speed up the time it takes to bring new products to market.

Under four separate calls for proposals, companies can pitch their innovative products and services to the government. Successful vendors are matched with appropriate departments in what Ms. Miller called the “e-Harmony approach.”

CATA had lobbied Public Works to introduce what it calls “technology test beds,” or opportunities for businesses to test their products and services within the government to gain valuable feedback and a significant reference account.

It is a core plank of the “Innovation Nation” platform championed by CATA national spokesperson and local tech mogul Terry Matthews.

“We need to consider how Canadian governments at all levels can play a larger role as early adopters and strong supporters of Canadian technologies, while still respecting our treaty obligations,” he said in a keynote address last year at an event hosted by Industry Canada.

CATA president and CEO John Reid said he hoped the program would also bring a culture change within the civil service, so bureaucrats look at government as a potential marketplace that can foster and be a catalyst for new technologies.

“That, in turn, creates a richer fabric of innovation in Canada,” said Mr. Reid, calling the government’s current approach “absolutely right on.”

The first call for proposals closes early next month, with contracts expected to be awarded in the spring.

 

 

FACT BOX: Canadian Innovation Commercialization Program primer

Size: $40 million over two years

Maximum contract value: $500,000

Structure: Four calls for proposals will be published for innovative goods and services under four broad categories: environment, health, safety and security, and enabling technologies. Proposals will be competitively evaluated on a point-based scale. Successful companies will be matched with end users within the government and receive feedback on their product.

Criteria: Products and services must be in the final stages of development, must not have been produced in great quantity, only ever have been sold for testing and demonstration and should not already be readily available in the marketplace. Subsidiaries of foreign companies are eligible, providing they have Canadian operations.

Source: Public Works and Government Services Canada

 

 

Comments

  • Username
    Maadiga
    - November 4, 2010 at 23:03:31

    While the program has been kicked of with a good vision, it is hugely prejudicial to small business. First of all, the lengthy red-tape documents that need to be submitted is a small barrier. Next, NRC will whet these proposals on many criteria. After that big business will wield the stick and adjudicate or rather arbitrate if their competition should be allowed to sell to the feds. So, how is the level playing field created ? End-users or the testing departments have no say in what small business innovation they want to adopt, until the very end stages. Why is this so ? Why cannot small businesses directly showcase their innovations in a trade-show or a forum where all end-users in the federal departments get to directly talk to these innovators ? When a small business sells to larger private business, they do not go through all these hoops. It is a direct B2B transaction, often with no middlemen involved. But when the same small business wants to sell to their government which is run by the taxes they paid, suddenly there are all sorts of hurdles sprung up. We need to ask why. Why do we need NRC and other big business as arbitrators to squeeze out their competition ? It is the incumbents who select a few of their co-opetitors to run along with them. Does this encourage small businesses ? Overall, a positive trend, but the playing field needs to be fair and even handed. Wait and watch......

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

Ottawa Business Journal is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Expert bloggers

BrazeauSeller.LLP
Blogger
Harold Feder
The Long Arm of the I.R.S.
Cartier Place Suite Hotel
Blogger
Heidi Webster
Travel tips
IDS Systems
Blogger
Ivo Mokros
Personal Clouds, Consumerization...
Richardson GMP Limited
Blogger
Alan MacDonald
What Dirty Harry Can Teach Us About...

More bloggers here

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising